The top 5 reasons your medical revenue claims are underpaid are:
Insurance companies often pay only 3% to 10% of what out-of-network emergency surgeons bill. They say they only have to pay the average in-network rate. Or, that the patient was already stable, so the rest of the treatment wasn’t an emergency.
Over time, repeated underpayments on complex surgeries can result in significant lost revenue. This is the reality for many out-of-network and emergency surgeons.
But you don’t have to accept these underpayments. The No Surprises Act created a process called Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) to resolve eligible out-of-network payment disputes. It’s important to understand why claims are underpaid so you can use IDR the right way.
Callagy Recovery helps you fight low insurance payments. We can recover 5x to 15x the initial amount.
Insurance companies use the Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA) for out-of-network payments to lower reimbursement. The QPA is supposed to be the median in-network rate for your procedure in your area. However, when calculating the QPA, insurers often:
The QPA becomes the baseline payment reference, even when it doesn’t reflect the complexity of the surgery. For example, a neurosurgeon might bill $120,000 for a complex emergency craniotomy. The insurer may:
Insurance companies downcode emergency medical services by disputing patient acuity and complexity. For example, you bill a Level 5 emergency department visit. You’re called for a severe facial trauma case. The patient has extensive soft tissue injuries, possible airway involvement, and requires complex reconstruction planning. The case is highly complex and time-sensitive. However, the insurer downcodes it to a Level 3 and pays less. The insurers’ arguments go something like this:
This is often coded as: CO-11 = incorrect coding.
Insurers review medical necessity after the service and may reduce or deny payment based on their own criteria. Emergency surgeons work under EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act). It requires screening and stabilization of emergency patients, no matter what. So:
But later, insurance companies review the case. They look back and decide if they think the treatment was “necessary.” If not, they may reduce payment or deny the claim altogether. They might say:
This is coded as: CO-50 = services not deemed medically necessary.
Insurance companies deny or limit post-stabilization care by applying transfer and authorization requirements. In many cases, a trauma patient is stabilized in the ER but still needs urgent surgery. You proceed because transferring the patient may not be safe. Later, the insurer denies the claim and says:
Insurance companies bundle distinct procedural services by denying separate payment for additional procedures. Sometimes you perform 2 separate procedures during the same surgery. For example, you may fix a broken femur (ORIF) and also clean an open knee wound (irrigation and debridement) during the same surgery. These are distinct procedures involving different anatomical areas and purposes. The insurer denies the second procedure and bundles it into the first. This means it’s not separately payable.
This is often coded as: CO-97 = service already included / previously adjudicated.

You can fight underpaid medical revenue claims through the Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process. Here’s how it works:
The Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) is a federal process under the No Surprises Act used to settle payment disputes between out-of-network providers and insurers. It applies when:
IDR works best when your documentation, coding, and market data clearly support the reimbursement you are requesting. The arbitrator’s decision is awarded to the side that’s better supported by the evidence and aligns with reasonable reimbursement standards. So if you present strong and relevant data, you are more likely to win these disputes and recover the money you rightfully earned.
QPA / low out-of-network payment.
✅ This is the most direct and strongest IDR category.
👉 Win point: You are proving the insurer’s QPA-based payment is below fair market value for your region and case type.
🏆 How to win:
Downcoding (CO-11).
✅ IDR eligible if dispute is about payment level for a covered service.
❌ Not eligible if insurer claims coding is incorrect or unsupported.
👉 Win point: You win by proving the record supports the higher level of service billed.
🏆 How to win:
Medical Necessity (CO-50).
✅ IDR eligible if service is covered but payment is reduced after review.
❌ Not eligible if insurer determines the service is not covered under the plan.
👉 Win point: You win by proving the decision was appropriate at the time of treatment.
🏆 How to win:
Post-Stabilization Denials (CO-15 / CO-197).
✅ IDR eligible if patient could not be safely transferred.
❌ Not eligible if insurer proves transfer was medically safe.
🏆 How to win:
Bundling (CO-97).
✅ IDR eligible if dispute is about separate payment for distinct services.
❌ Not eligible if insurer treats it as a coding/NCCI edit issue only.
👉 Win point: You win by proving the procedures are separate and independently billable.
🏆 How to win:

Underpayments in out-of-network and emergency surgery are not random. They follow clear patterns like QPA reductions, downcoding, medical necessity reviews, post-stabilization disputes, and bundling issues.
These reductions don’t reflect the true value of your work. They reflect how insurers review and reduce payment after the treatment has already been provided and billed. Many of these claims can still be challenged and recovered when the proper process is used within the required timelines and supported with the right documentation.
This is exactly where Callagy Recovery steps in. We handle the burden of fighting insurers, building arbitration-ready cases, and pursuing full payment recovery from start to finish.